姐,我要。。。
轻松的小说阅读环境
巴黎圣母院英文版 - BOOK THIRD CHAPTER I.NOTRE-DAME.
繁体
恢复默认
返回目录【键盘操作】左右光标键:上下章节;回车键:目录;双击鼠标:停止/启动自动滚动;滚动时上下光标键调节滚动速度。
  The church of Notre-Dame de paris is still no doubt, a majestic and sublime edifice.But, beautiful as it has been preserved in growing old, it is difficult not to sigh, not to wax indignant, before the numberless degradations and mutilations which time and men have both caused the venerable monument to suffer, without respect for Charlemagne, who laid its first stone, or for philip Augustus, who laid the last.On the face of this aged queen of our cathedrals, by the side of a wrinkle, one always finds a scar.~Tempus edax, homo edacior*~; which I should be glad to translate thus: time is blind, man is stupid.*Time is a devourer; man, more so.If we had leisure to examine with the reader, one by one, the diverse traces of destruction imprinted upon the old church, time's share would be the least, the share of men the most, especially the men of art, since there have been individuals who assumed the title of architects during the last two centuries.And, in the first place, to cite only a few leading examples, there certainly are few finer architectural pages than this fa?ade, where, successively and at once, the three portals hollowed out in an arch; the broidered and dentated cordon of the eight and twenty royal niches; the immense central rose window, flanked by its two lateral windows, like a priest by his deacon and subdeacon; the frail and lofty gallery of trefoil arcades, which supports a heavy platform above its fine, slender columns; and lastly, the two black and massive towers with their slate penthouses, harmonious parts of a magnificent whole, superposed in five gigantic stories;--develop themselves before the eye, in a mass and without confusion, with their innumerable details of statuary, carving, and sculpture, joined powerfully to the tranquil grandeur of the whole; a vast symphony in stone, so to speak; the colossal work of one man and one people, all together one and complex, like the Iliads and the Romanceros, whose sister it is; prodigious product of the grouping together of all the forces of an epoch, where, upon each stone, one sees the fancy of the workman disciplined by the genius of the artist start forth in a hundred fashions; a sort of human creation, in a word, powerful and fecund as the divine creation of which it seems to have stolen the double character,--variety, eternity.And what we here say of the fa?ade must be said of the entire church; and what we say of the cathedral church of paris, must be said of all the churches of Christendom in the Middle Ages.All things are in place in that art, self-created, logical, and well proportioned.To measure the great toe of the foot is to measure the giant.Let us return to the fa?ade of Notre-Dame, as it still appears to us, when we go piously to admire the grave and puissant cathedral, which inspires terror, so its chronicles assert: ~quoe mole sua terrorem incutit spectantibus~.Three important things are to-day lacking in that fa?ade: in the first place, the staircase of eleven steps which formerly raised it above the soil; next, the lower series of statues which occupied the niches of the three portals; and lastly the upper series, of the twenty-eight most ancient kings of France, which garnished the gallery of the first story, beginning with Childebert, and ending with phillip Augustus, holding in his hand "the imperial apple."Time has caused the staircase to disappear, by raising the soil of the city with a slow and irresistible progress; but, while thus causing the eleven steps which added to the majestic height of the edifice, to be devoured, one by one, by the rising tide of the pavements of paris,--time has bestowed upon the church perhaps more than it has taken away, for it is time which has spread over the fa?ade that sombre hue of the centuries which makes the old age of monuments the period of their beauty.But who has thrown down the two rows of statues? who has left the niches empty? who has cut, in the very middle of the central portal, that new and bastard arch? who has dared to frame therein that commonplace and heavy door of carved wood, à la Louis XV., beside the arabesques of Biscornette? The men, the architects, the artists of our day.And if we enter the interior of the edifice, who has overthrown that colossus of Saint Christopher, proverbial for magnitude among statues, as the grand hall of the palais de Justice was among halls, as the spire of Strasbourg among spires? And those myriads of statues, which peopled all the spaces between the columns of the nave and the choir, kneeling, standing, equestrian, men, women, children, kings, bishops, gendarmes, in stone, in marble, in gold, in silver, in copper, in wax even,--who has brutally swept them away? It is not time.And who substituted for the ancient gothic altar, splendidly encumbered with shrines and reliquaries, that heavy marble sarcophagus, with angels' heads and clouds, which seems a specimen pillaged from the Val-de-Grace or the Invalides? Who stupidly sealed that heavy anachronism of stone in the Carlovingian pavement of Hercandus?Was it not Louis XIV., fulfilling the request of Louis XIII.?And who put the cold, white panes in the place of those windows," high in color, "which caused the astonished eyes of our fathers to hesitate between the rose of the grand portal and the arches of the apse?And what would a sub-chanter of the sixteenth century say, on beholding the beautiful yellow wash, with which our archiepiscopal vandals have desmeared their cathedral?He would remember that it was the color with which the hangman smeared "accursed" edifices; he would recall the H?tel du petit-Bourbon, all smeared thus, on account of the constable's treason."Yellow, after all, of so good a quality," said Sauval, "and so well recommended, that more than a century has not yet caused it to lose its color." He would think that the sacred place had become infamous, and would flee.And if we ascend the cathedral, without mentioning a thousand barbarisms of every sort,--what has become of that charming little bell tower, which rested upon the point of intersection of the cross-roofs, and which, no less frail and no less bold than its neighbor (also destroyed), the spire of the Sainte-Chapelle, buried itself in the sky, farther forward than the towers, slender, pointed, sonorous, carved in open work. An architect of good taste amputated it (1787), and considered it sufficient to mask the wound with that large, leaden plaster, which resembles a pot cover.'Tis thus that the marvellous art of the Middle Ages has been treated in nearly every country, especially in France. One can distinguish on its ruins three sorts of lesions, all three of which cut into it at different depths; first, time, which has insensibly notched its surface here and there, and gnawed it everywhere; next, political and religious revolution, which, blind and wrathful by nature, have flung themselves tumultuously upon it, torn its rich garment of carving and sculpture, burst its rose windows, broken its necklace of arabesques and tiny figures, torn out its statues, sometimes because of their mitres, sometimes because of their crowns; lastly, fashions, even more grotesque and foolish, which, since the anarchical and splendid deviations of the Renaissance, have followed each other in the necessary decadence of architecture.Fashions have wrought more harm than revolutions. They have cut to the quick; they have attacked the very bone and framework of art; they have cut, slashed, disorganized, killed the edifice, in form as in the symbol, in its consistency as well as in its beauty.And then they have made it over; a presumption of which neither time nor revolutions at least have been guilty.They have audaciously adjusted, in the name of "good taste," upon the wounds of gothic architecture, their miserable gewgaws of a day, their ribbons of marble, their pompons of metal, a veritable leprosy of egg-shaped ornaments, volutes, whorls, draperies, garlands, fringes, stone flames, bronze clouds, pudgy cupids, chubby- cheeked cherubim, which begin to devour the face of art in the oratory of Catherine de Medicis, and cause it to expire, two centuries later, tortured and grimacing, in the boudoir of the Dubarry.Thus, to sum up the points which we have just indicated, three sorts of ravages to-day disfigure Gothic architecture. Wrinkles and warts on the epidermis; this is the work of time.Deeds of violence, brutalities, contusions, fractures; this is the work of the revolutions from Luther to Mirabeau. Mutilations, amputations, dislocation of the joints, "restorations"; this is the Greek, Roman, and barbarian work of professors according to Vitruvius and Vignole.This magnificent art produced by the Vandals has been slain by the academies.The centuries, the revolutions, which at least devastate with impartiality and grandeur, have been joined by a cloud of school architects, licensed, sworn, and bound by oath; defacing with the discernment and choice of bad taste, substituting the ~chicorées~ of Louis XV. for the Gothic lace, for the greater glory of the parthenon.It is the kick of the ass at the dying lion.It is the old oak crowning itself, and which, to heap the measure full, is stung, bitten, and gnawed by caterpillars.How far it is from the epoch when Robert Cenalis, comparing Notre-Dame de paris to the famous temple of Diana at Ephesus, *so much lauded by the ancient pagans*, which Erostatus *has* immortalized, found the Gallic temple "more excellent in length, breadth, height, and structure."**_Histoire Gallicane_, liv. II. periode III. fo. 130, p. 1.Notre-Dame is not, moreover, what can be called a complete, definite, classified monument.It is no longer a Romanesque church; nor is it a Gothic church.This edifice is not a type.Notre-Dame de paris has not, like the Abbey of Tournus, the grave and massive frame, the large and round vault, the glacial bareness, the majestic simplicity of the edifices which have the rounded arch for their progenitor.It is not, like the Cathedral of Bourges, the magnificent, light, multiform, tufted, bristling efflorescent product of the pointed arch.Impossible to class it in that ancient family of sombre, mysterious churches, low and crushed as it were by the round arch, almost Egyptian, with the exception of the ceiling; all hieroglyphics, all sacerdotal, all symbolical, more loaded in their ornaments, with lozenges and zigzags, than with flowers, with flowers than with animals, with animals than with men; the work of the architect less than of the bishop; first transformation of art, all impressed with theocratic and military discipline, taking root in the Lower Empire, and stopping with the time of William the Conqueror.Impossible to place our Cathedral in that other family of lofty, aerial churches, rich in painted windows and sculpture; pointed in form, bold in attitude; communal and bourgeois as political symbols; free, capricious, lawless, as a work of art; second transformation of architecture, no longer hieroglyphic, immovable and sacerdotal, but artistic, progressive, and popular, which begins at the return from the crusades, and ends with Louis IX.Notre-Dame de paris is not of pure Romanesque, like the first; nor of pure Arabian race, like the second.It is an edifice of the transition period.The Saxon architect completed the erection of the first pillars of the nave, when the pointed arch, which dates from the Crusade, arrived and placed itself as a conqueror upon the large Romanesque capitals which should support only round arches.The pointed arch, mistress since that time, constructed the rest of the church.Nevertheless, timid and inexperienced at the start, it sweeps out, grows larger, restrains itself, and dares no longer dart upwards in spires and lancet windows, as it did later on, in so many marvellous cathedrals.One would say that it were conscious of the vicinity of the heavy Romanesque pillars.However, these edifices of the transition from the Romanesque to the Gothic, are no less precious for study than the pure types.They express a shade of the art which would be lost without them.It is the graft of the pointed upon the round arch.Notre-Dame de paris is, in particular, a curious specimen of this variety.Each face, each stone of the venerable monument, is a page not only of the history of the country, but of the history of science and art as well.Thus, in order to indicate here only the principal details, while the little Red Door almost attains to the limits of the Gothic delicacy of the fifteenth century, the pillars of the nave, by their size and weight, go back to the Carlovingian Abbey of Saint-Germain des prés.One would suppose that six centuries separated these pillars from that door.There is no one, not even the hermetics, who does not find in the symbols of the grand portal a satisfactory compendium of their science, of which the Church of Saint-Jacques de la Boucherie was so complete a hieroglyph.Thus, the Roman abbey, the philosophers' church, the Gothic art, Saxon art, the heavy, round pillar, which recalls Gregory VII., the hermetic symbolism, with which Nicolas Flamel played the prelude to Luther, papal unity, schism, Saint-Germain des prés, Saint-Jacques de la Boucherie,--all are mingled, combined, amalgamated in Notre-Dame.This central mother church is, among the ancient churches of paris, a sort of chimera; it has the head of one, the limbs of another, the haunches of another, something of all.We repeat it, these hybrid constructions are not the least interesting for the artist, for the antiquarian, for the historian. They make one feel to what a degree architecture is a primitive thing, by demonstrating (what is also demonstrated by the cyclopean vestiges, the pyramids of Egypt, the gigantic Hindoo pagodas) that the greatest products of architecture are less the works of individuals than of society; rather the offspring of a nation's effort, than the inspired flash of a man of genius; the deposit left by a whole people; the heaps accumulated by centuries; the residue of successive evaporations of human society,--in a word, species of formations. Each wave of time contributes its alluvium, each race deposits its layer on the monument, each individual brings his stone.Thus do the beavers, thus do the bees, thus do men.The great symbol of architecture, Babel, is a hive.Great edifices, like great mountains, are the work of centuries. Art often undergoes a transformation while they are pending, ~pendent opera interrupta~; they proceed quietly in accordance with the transformed art.The new art takes the monument where it finds it, incrusts itself there, assimilates it to itself, develops it according to its fancy, and finishes it if it can. The thing is accomplished without trouble, without effort, without reaction,--following a natural and tranquil law.It is a graft which shoots up, a sap which circulates, a vegetation which starts forth anew.Certainly there is matter here for many large volumes, and often the universal history of humanity in the successive engrafting of many arts at many levels, upon the same monument.The man, the artist, the individual, is effaced in these great masses, which lack the name of their author; human intelligence is there summed up and totalized.Time is the architect, the nation is the builder.Not to consider here anything except the Christian architecture of Europe, that younger sister of the great masonries of the Orient, it appears to the eyes as an immense formation divided into three well-defined zones, which are superposed, the one upon the other: the Romanesque zone*, the Gothic zone, the zone of the Renaissance, which we would gladly call the Greco-Roman zone.The Roman layer, which is the most ancient and deepest, is occupied by the round arch, which reappears, supported by the Greek column, in the modern and upper layer of the Renaissance.The pointed arch is found between the two.The edifices which belong exclusively to any one of these three layers are perfectly distinct, uniform, and complete.There is the Abbey of Jumiéges, there is the Cathedral of Reims, there is the Sainte-Croix of Orleans.But the three zones mingle and amalgamate along the edges, like the colors in the solar spectrum.Hence, complex monuments, edifices of gradation and transition.One is Roman at the base, Gothic in the middle, Greco-Roman at the top.It is because it was six hundred years in building.This variety is rare.The donjon keep of d'Etampes is a specimen of it.But monuments of two formations are more frequent.There is Notre-Dame de paris, a pointed-arch edifice, which is imbedded by its pillars in that Roman zone, in which are plunged the portal of Saint-Denis, and the nave of Saint-Germain des prés.There is the charming, half-Gothic chapter-house of Bocherville, where the Roman layer extends half way up.There is the cathedral of Rouen, which would be entirely Gothic if it did not bathe the tip of its central spire in the zone of the Renaissance.***This is the same which is called, according to locality, climate, and races, Lombard, Saxon, or Byzantine.There are four sister and parallel architectures, each having its special character, but derived from the same origin, the round arch.~Facies non omnibus una, No diversa tamen, qualem~, etc.Their faces not all alike, nor yet different, but such as the faces of sisters ought to be.**This portion of the spire, which was of woodwork, is precisely that which was consumed by lightning, in 1823.However, all these shades, all these differences, do not affect the surfaces of edifices only.It is art which has changed its skin.The very constitution of the Christian church is not attacked by it.There is always the same internal woodwork, the same logical arrangement of parts. Whatever may be the carved and embroidered envelope of a cathedral, one always finds beneath it--in the state of a germ, and of a rudiment at the least--the Roman basilica. It is eternally developed upon the soil according to the same law.There are, invariably, two naves, which intersect in a cross, and whose upper portion, rounded into an apse, forms the choir; there are always the side aisles, for interior processions, for chapels,--a sort of lateral walks or promenades where the principal nave discharges itself through the spaces between the pillars.That settled, the number of chapels, doors, bell towers, and pinnacles are modified to infinity, according to the fancy of the century, the people, and art. The service of religion once assured and provided for, architecture does what she pleases.Statues, stained glass, rose windows, arabesques, denticulations, capitals, bas-reliefs,--she combines all these imaginings according to the arrangement which best suits her.Hence, the prodigious exterior variety of these edifices, at whose foundation dwells so much order and unity.The trunk of a tree is immovable; the foliage is capricious.
或许您还会喜欢:
关于莉莉周的一切
作者:佚名
章节:19 人气:0
摘要:自从那次涉谷四叶大厦现场演唱会结束之后,已经过了三个月。在这几个月中,事件的余波依旧冲击着莉莉周。 [点击阅读]
其他诗集
作者:佚名
章节:8 人气:0
摘要:[印]戈斯这一时期②,诗人一开始便尝试一种新的样式——散文诗。虽然泰戈尔的大部分翻译作品都采用了散文诗这种形式,然而这些作品的孟加拉文原著,显然都是些出色的韵文。那么,诗人到底为什么动手写起了散文诗呢?人们自然会以为,采用散文诗写作与“散文”③《吉檀迦利》的成功(指英译本)有关,诗人自己也赞同这种观点(《再次集》导言)。 [点击阅读]
冒险史系列
作者:佚名
章节:12 人气:0
摘要:一歇洛克-福尔摩斯始终称呼她为那位女人。我很少听见他提到她时用过别的称呼。在他的心目中,她才貌超群,其他女人无不黯然失色。这倒并不是说他对艾琳-艾德勒有什么近乎爱情的感情。因为对于他那强调理性、严谨刻板和令人钦佩、冷静沉着的头脑来说,一切情感,特别是爱情这种情感,都是格格不入的。我认为,他简直是世界上一架用于推理和观察的最完美无瑕的机器。但是作为情人,他却会把自己置于错误的地位。 [点击阅读]
冤家,一个爱情故事
作者:佚名
章节:10 人气:0
摘要:第一章1赫尔曼·布罗德翻了个身,睁开一只眼睛。他睡得稀里糊涂,拿不准自己是在美国,在齐甫凯夫还是在德国难民营里。他甚至想象自己正躲在利普斯克的草料棚里。有时,这几处地方在他心里混在一起。他知道自己是在布鲁克林,可是他能听到纳粹分子的哈喝声。他们用刺刀乱捅,想把他吓出来,他拚命往草料棚深处钻。刺刀尖都碰到了他的脑袋。需要有个果断的动作才能完全清醒过来。 [点击阅读]
冰与火之歌1
作者:佚名
章节:73 人气:0
摘要:“既然野人①已经死了,”眼看周围的树林逐渐黯淡,盖瑞不禁催促,“咱们回头吧。”“死人吓着你了吗?”威玛·罗伊斯爵士带着轻浅的笑意问。盖瑞并未中激将之计,年过五十的他也算得上是个老人,这辈子看过太多贵族子弟来来去去。“死了就是死了,”他说,“咱们何必追寻死人。”“你能确定他们真死了?”罗伊斯轻声问,“证据何在?”“威尔看到了,”盖瑞道,“我相信他说的话。 [点击阅读]
冰与火之歌2
作者:佚名
章节:23 人气:0
摘要:彗星的尾巴划过清晨,好似紫红天幕上的一道伤口,在龙石岛的危崖绝壁上空汩汩泣血。老学士独自伫立在卧房外狂风怒吼的阳台上。信鸦长途跋涉之后,正是于此停息。两尊十二尺高的石像立在两侧,一边是地狱犬,一边是长翼龙,其上洒布着乌鸦粪便。这样的石像鬼为数过千,蹲踞于瓦雷利亚古城高墙之上。当年他初抵龙石岛,曾因满城的狰狞石像而局促不安。 [点击阅读]
冰与火之歌4
作者:佚名
章节:86 人气:0
摘要:Chapter1序章“龙。”莫兰德边说,边从地上抓起一只干瘪的苹果,在双手之间丢来丢去。“扔啊。”外号“斯芬克斯”的拉蕾萨催促。他从箭囊里抽出一支箭,搭上弓弦。“我想看龙。”鲁尼在他们当中年纪最小,又矮又胖,尚有两岁才成年。“哪怕一眼都好。”我想萝希搂着我睡觉,佩特心想。 [点击阅读]
分歧者
作者:佚名
章节:41 人气:0
摘要:作品导读如果世界按照所有最美的特质划归五派:无私、无畏、诚实、友好和博学,在这样一个世界里,还会不会有杀戮、争端、夺权、暴乱?答案你知道。因为丑恶从未消失,它只是被深深地隐藏起来,妄图在某一天爆发出来,冲毁这世界。 [点击阅读]
初恋
作者:佚名
章节:12 人气:0
摘要:献给巴-瓦-安年科夫①……客人们早已散去。时钟敲过了十二点半。只有主人、谢尔盖-尼古拉耶维奇和弗拉基米尔-彼得罗维奇还在屋子里。主人按了一下铃,吩咐收拾晚饭的残杯冷炙。“那么这件事就决定了,”他低声说着,更深地埋入圈椅里,并把雪茄点上火抽了起来,“我们每个人都得讲讲自己初恋的故事。您先讲,谢尔盖-尼古拉耶维奇。 [点击阅读]
刺猬的优雅
作者:佚名
章节:18 人气:0
摘要:马克思(开场白)1.播种欲望的人马克思彻底改变了我的世界观,平时从不跟我讲话的小帕利埃今天早上如此向我宣布。安托万帕利埃,这个古老工业家族的继承者,他的父亲是我八个雇主之一。他是资产阶级大财团打的最后的饱嗝——特别而毫无杂质——此时,他正为自己的发现而洋洋得意,条件反射似的向我阐述起他的大道理,甚至没有考虑到我是否能听得懂, [点击阅读]
加勒比海之谜
作者:佚名
章节:25 人气:0
摘要:“就拿肯亚来说吧,”白尔格瑞夫少校说:“好多家伙讲个没完,却一个都没去过!我可在那度过了十四年的。也是我一生最快乐的一段日子——”老玛波小姐点了点头。这是她的一种礼貌性的和霭态度。白尔格瑞夫在一旁追问他一生中并不怎么动人的往事时,玛波小姐静静地寻找她自己的思路。这种司空见惯之事她早已熟悉了。顶多故事发生的地点不同而已。 [点击阅读]
动物农场
作者:佚名
章节:35 人气:0
摘要:庄园农场的琼斯先生锁好几间鸡棚准备过夜,只是这一天他喝得烂醉,竟忘记关上那几扇小门了。他东倒西歪地走过院子,手中一盏提灯的光圈也随着摇摇晃晃。走进后门,他把靴子甩掉,又从放在洗碗间的酒桶里给自己倒了这一天的最后一杯啤酒,就爬上床去。这时琼斯太太早已在那儿打呼噜了。琼斯先生寝室里的灯光一灭,农场里个个厩棚就响起一阵骚动和嘈杂的声响。 [点击阅读]