姐,我要。。。
轻松的小说阅读环境
巴黎圣母院英文版 - BOOK THIRD CHAPTER I.NOTRE-DAME.
繁体
恢复默认
返回目录【键盘操作】左右光标键:上下章节;回车键:目录;双击鼠标:停止/启动自动滚动;滚动时上下光标键调节滚动速度。
  The church of Notre-Dame de paris is still no doubt, a majestic and sublime edifice.But, beautiful as it has been preserved in growing old, it is difficult not to sigh, not to wax indignant, before the numberless degradations and mutilations which time and men have both caused the venerable monument to suffer, without respect for Charlemagne, who laid its first stone, or for philip Augustus, who laid the last.On the face of this aged queen of our cathedrals, by the side of a wrinkle, one always finds a scar.~Tempus edax, homo edacior*~; which I should be glad to translate thus: time is blind, man is stupid.*Time is a devourer; man, more so.If we had leisure to examine with the reader, one by one, the diverse traces of destruction imprinted upon the old church, time's share would be the least, the share of men the most, especially the men of art, since there have been individuals who assumed the title of architects during the last two centuries.And, in the first place, to cite only a few leading examples, there certainly are few finer architectural pages than this fa?ade, where, successively and at once, the three portals hollowed out in an arch; the broidered and dentated cordon of the eight and twenty royal niches; the immense central rose window, flanked by its two lateral windows, like a priest by his deacon and subdeacon; the frail and lofty gallery of trefoil arcades, which supports a heavy platform above its fine, slender columns; and lastly, the two black and massive towers with their slate penthouses, harmonious parts of a magnificent whole, superposed in five gigantic stories;--develop themselves before the eye, in a mass and without confusion, with their innumerable details of statuary, carving, and sculpture, joined powerfully to the tranquil grandeur of the whole; a vast symphony in stone, so to speak; the colossal work of one man and one people, all together one and complex, like the Iliads and the Romanceros, whose sister it is; prodigious product of the grouping together of all the forces of an epoch, where, upon each stone, one sees the fancy of the workman disciplined by the genius of the artist start forth in a hundred fashions; a sort of human creation, in a word, powerful and fecund as the divine creation of which it seems to have stolen the double character,--variety, eternity.And what we here say of the fa?ade must be said of the entire church; and what we say of the cathedral church of paris, must be said of all the churches of Christendom in the Middle Ages.All things are in place in that art, self-created, logical, and well proportioned.To measure the great toe of the foot is to measure the giant.Let us return to the fa?ade of Notre-Dame, as it still appears to us, when we go piously to admire the grave and puissant cathedral, which inspires terror, so its chronicles assert: ~quoe mole sua terrorem incutit spectantibus~.Three important things are to-day lacking in that fa?ade: in the first place, the staircase of eleven steps which formerly raised it above the soil; next, the lower series of statues which occupied the niches of the three portals; and lastly the upper series, of the twenty-eight most ancient kings of France, which garnished the gallery of the first story, beginning with Childebert, and ending with phillip Augustus, holding in his hand "the imperial apple."Time has caused the staircase to disappear, by raising the soil of the city with a slow and irresistible progress; but, while thus causing the eleven steps which added to the majestic height of the edifice, to be devoured, one by one, by the rising tide of the pavements of paris,--time has bestowed upon the church perhaps more than it has taken away, for it is time which has spread over the fa?ade that sombre hue of the centuries which makes the old age of monuments the period of their beauty.But who has thrown down the two rows of statues? who has left the niches empty? who has cut, in the very middle of the central portal, that new and bastard arch? who has dared to frame therein that commonplace and heavy door of carved wood, à la Louis XV., beside the arabesques of Biscornette? The men, the architects, the artists of our day.And if we enter the interior of the edifice, who has overthrown that colossus of Saint Christopher, proverbial for magnitude among statues, as the grand hall of the palais de Justice was among halls, as the spire of Strasbourg among spires? And those myriads of statues, which peopled all the spaces between the columns of the nave and the choir, kneeling, standing, equestrian, men, women, children, kings, bishops, gendarmes, in stone, in marble, in gold, in silver, in copper, in wax even,--who has brutally swept them away? It is not time.And who substituted for the ancient gothic altar, splendidly encumbered with shrines and reliquaries, that heavy marble sarcophagus, with angels' heads and clouds, which seems a specimen pillaged from the Val-de-Grace or the Invalides? Who stupidly sealed that heavy anachronism of stone in the Carlovingian pavement of Hercandus?Was it not Louis XIV., fulfilling the request of Louis XIII.?And who put the cold, white panes in the place of those windows," high in color, "which caused the astonished eyes of our fathers to hesitate between the rose of the grand portal and the arches of the apse?And what would a sub-chanter of the sixteenth century say, on beholding the beautiful yellow wash, with which our archiepiscopal vandals have desmeared their cathedral?He would remember that it was the color with which the hangman smeared "accursed" edifices; he would recall the H?tel du petit-Bourbon, all smeared thus, on account of the constable's treason."Yellow, after all, of so good a quality," said Sauval, "and so well recommended, that more than a century has not yet caused it to lose its color." He would think that the sacred place had become infamous, and would flee.And if we ascend the cathedral, without mentioning a thousand barbarisms of every sort,--what has become of that charming little bell tower, which rested upon the point of intersection of the cross-roofs, and which, no less frail and no less bold than its neighbor (also destroyed), the spire of the Sainte-Chapelle, buried itself in the sky, farther forward than the towers, slender, pointed, sonorous, carved in open work. An architect of good taste amputated it (1787), and considered it sufficient to mask the wound with that large, leaden plaster, which resembles a pot cover.'Tis thus that the marvellous art of the Middle Ages has been treated in nearly every country, especially in France. One can distinguish on its ruins three sorts of lesions, all three of which cut into it at different depths; first, time, which has insensibly notched its surface here and there, and gnawed it everywhere; next, political and religious revolution, which, blind and wrathful by nature, have flung themselves tumultuously upon it, torn its rich garment of carving and sculpture, burst its rose windows, broken its necklace of arabesques and tiny figures, torn out its statues, sometimes because of their mitres, sometimes because of their crowns; lastly, fashions, even more grotesque and foolish, which, since the anarchical and splendid deviations of the Renaissance, have followed each other in the necessary decadence of architecture.Fashions have wrought more harm than revolutions. They have cut to the quick; they have attacked the very bone and framework of art; they have cut, slashed, disorganized, killed the edifice, in form as in the symbol, in its consistency as well as in its beauty.And then they have made it over; a presumption of which neither time nor revolutions at least have been guilty.They have audaciously adjusted, in the name of "good taste," upon the wounds of gothic architecture, their miserable gewgaws of a day, their ribbons of marble, their pompons of metal, a veritable leprosy of egg-shaped ornaments, volutes, whorls, draperies, garlands, fringes, stone flames, bronze clouds, pudgy cupids, chubby- cheeked cherubim, which begin to devour the face of art in the oratory of Catherine de Medicis, and cause it to expire, two centuries later, tortured and grimacing, in the boudoir of the Dubarry.Thus, to sum up the points which we have just indicated, three sorts of ravages to-day disfigure Gothic architecture. Wrinkles and warts on the epidermis; this is the work of time.Deeds of violence, brutalities, contusions, fractures; this is the work of the revolutions from Luther to Mirabeau. Mutilations, amputations, dislocation of the joints, "restorations"; this is the Greek, Roman, and barbarian work of professors according to Vitruvius and Vignole.This magnificent art produced by the Vandals has been slain by the academies.The centuries, the revolutions, which at least devastate with impartiality and grandeur, have been joined by a cloud of school architects, licensed, sworn, and bound by oath; defacing with the discernment and choice of bad taste, substituting the ~chicorées~ of Louis XV. for the Gothic lace, for the greater glory of the parthenon.It is the kick of the ass at the dying lion.It is the old oak crowning itself, and which, to heap the measure full, is stung, bitten, and gnawed by caterpillars.How far it is from the epoch when Robert Cenalis, comparing Notre-Dame de paris to the famous temple of Diana at Ephesus, *so much lauded by the ancient pagans*, which Erostatus *has* immortalized, found the Gallic temple "more excellent in length, breadth, height, and structure."**_Histoire Gallicane_, liv. II. periode III. fo. 130, p. 1.Notre-Dame is not, moreover, what can be called a complete, definite, classified monument.It is no longer a Romanesque church; nor is it a Gothic church.This edifice is not a type.Notre-Dame de paris has not, like the Abbey of Tournus, the grave and massive frame, the large and round vault, the glacial bareness, the majestic simplicity of the edifices which have the rounded arch for their progenitor.It is not, like the Cathedral of Bourges, the magnificent, light, multiform, tufted, bristling efflorescent product of the pointed arch.Impossible to class it in that ancient family of sombre, mysterious churches, low and crushed as it were by the round arch, almost Egyptian, with the exception of the ceiling; all hieroglyphics, all sacerdotal, all symbolical, more loaded in their ornaments, with lozenges and zigzags, than with flowers, with flowers than with animals, with animals than with men; the work of the architect less than of the bishop; first transformation of art, all impressed with theocratic and military discipline, taking root in the Lower Empire, and stopping with the time of William the Conqueror.Impossible to place our Cathedral in that other family of lofty, aerial churches, rich in painted windows and sculpture; pointed in form, bold in attitude; communal and bourgeois as political symbols; free, capricious, lawless, as a work of art; second transformation of architecture, no longer hieroglyphic, immovable and sacerdotal, but artistic, progressive, and popular, which begins at the return from the crusades, and ends with Louis IX.Notre-Dame de paris is not of pure Romanesque, like the first; nor of pure Arabian race, like the second.It is an edifice of the transition period.The Saxon architect completed the erection of the first pillars of the nave, when the pointed arch, which dates from the Crusade, arrived and placed itself as a conqueror upon the large Romanesque capitals which should support only round arches.The pointed arch, mistress since that time, constructed the rest of the church.Nevertheless, timid and inexperienced at the start, it sweeps out, grows larger, restrains itself, and dares no longer dart upwards in spires and lancet windows, as it did later on, in so many marvellous cathedrals.One would say that it were conscious of the vicinity of the heavy Romanesque pillars.However, these edifices of the transition from the Romanesque to the Gothic, are no less precious for study than the pure types.They express a shade of the art which would be lost without them.It is the graft of the pointed upon the round arch.Notre-Dame de paris is, in particular, a curious specimen of this variety.Each face, each stone of the venerable monument, is a page not only of the history of the country, but of the history of science and art as well.Thus, in order to indicate here only the principal details, while the little Red Door almost attains to the limits of the Gothic delicacy of the fifteenth century, the pillars of the nave, by their size and weight, go back to the Carlovingian Abbey of Saint-Germain des prés.One would suppose that six centuries separated these pillars from that door.There is no one, not even the hermetics, who does not find in the symbols of the grand portal a satisfactory compendium of their science, of which the Church of Saint-Jacques de la Boucherie was so complete a hieroglyph.Thus, the Roman abbey, the philosophers' church, the Gothic art, Saxon art, the heavy, round pillar, which recalls Gregory VII., the hermetic symbolism, with which Nicolas Flamel played the prelude to Luther, papal unity, schism, Saint-Germain des prés, Saint-Jacques de la Boucherie,--all are mingled, combined, amalgamated in Notre-Dame.This central mother church is, among the ancient churches of paris, a sort of chimera; it has the head of one, the limbs of another, the haunches of another, something of all.We repeat it, these hybrid constructions are not the least interesting for the artist, for the antiquarian, for the historian. They make one feel to what a degree architecture is a primitive thing, by demonstrating (what is also demonstrated by the cyclopean vestiges, the pyramids of Egypt, the gigantic Hindoo pagodas) that the greatest products of architecture are less the works of individuals than of society; rather the offspring of a nation's effort, than the inspired flash of a man of genius; the deposit left by a whole people; the heaps accumulated by centuries; the residue of successive evaporations of human society,--in a word, species of formations. Each wave of time contributes its alluvium, each race deposits its layer on the monument, each individual brings his stone.Thus do the beavers, thus do the bees, thus do men.The great symbol of architecture, Babel, is a hive.Great edifices, like great mountains, are the work of centuries. Art often undergoes a transformation while they are pending, ~pendent opera interrupta~; they proceed quietly in accordance with the transformed art.The new art takes the monument where it finds it, incrusts itself there, assimilates it to itself, develops it according to its fancy, and finishes it if it can. The thing is accomplished without trouble, without effort, without reaction,--following a natural and tranquil law.It is a graft which shoots up, a sap which circulates, a vegetation which starts forth anew.Certainly there is matter here for many large volumes, and often the universal history of humanity in the successive engrafting of many arts at many levels, upon the same monument.The man, the artist, the individual, is effaced in these great masses, which lack the name of their author; human intelligence is there summed up and totalized.Time is the architect, the nation is the builder.Not to consider here anything except the Christian architecture of Europe, that younger sister of the great masonries of the Orient, it appears to the eyes as an immense formation divided into three well-defined zones, which are superposed, the one upon the other: the Romanesque zone*, the Gothic zone, the zone of the Renaissance, which we would gladly call the Greco-Roman zone.The Roman layer, which is the most ancient and deepest, is occupied by the round arch, which reappears, supported by the Greek column, in the modern and upper layer of the Renaissance.The pointed arch is found between the two.The edifices which belong exclusively to any one of these three layers are perfectly distinct, uniform, and complete.There is the Abbey of Jumiéges, there is the Cathedral of Reims, there is the Sainte-Croix of Orleans.But the three zones mingle and amalgamate along the edges, like the colors in the solar spectrum.Hence, complex monuments, edifices of gradation and transition.One is Roman at the base, Gothic in the middle, Greco-Roman at the top.It is because it was six hundred years in building.This variety is rare.The donjon keep of d'Etampes is a specimen of it.But monuments of two formations are more frequent.There is Notre-Dame de paris, a pointed-arch edifice, which is imbedded by its pillars in that Roman zone, in which are plunged the portal of Saint-Denis, and the nave of Saint-Germain des prés.There is the charming, half-Gothic chapter-house of Bocherville, where the Roman layer extends half way up.There is the cathedral of Rouen, which would be entirely Gothic if it did not bathe the tip of its central spire in the zone of the Renaissance.***This is the same which is called, according to locality, climate, and races, Lombard, Saxon, or Byzantine.There are four sister and parallel architectures, each having its special character, but derived from the same origin, the round arch.~Facies non omnibus una, No diversa tamen, qualem~, etc.Their faces not all alike, nor yet different, but such as the faces of sisters ought to be.**This portion of the spire, which was of woodwork, is precisely that which was consumed by lightning, in 1823.However, all these shades, all these differences, do not affect the surfaces of edifices only.It is art which has changed its skin.The very constitution of the Christian church is not attacked by it.There is always the same internal woodwork, the same logical arrangement of parts. Whatever may be the carved and embroidered envelope of a cathedral, one always finds beneath it--in the state of a germ, and of a rudiment at the least--the Roman basilica. It is eternally developed upon the soil according to the same law.There are, invariably, two naves, which intersect in a cross, and whose upper portion, rounded into an apse, forms the choir; there are always the side aisles, for interior processions, for chapels,--a sort of lateral walks or promenades where the principal nave discharges itself through the spaces between the pillars.That settled, the number of chapels, doors, bell towers, and pinnacles are modified to infinity, according to the fancy of the century, the people, and art. The service of religion once assured and provided for, architecture does what she pleases.Statues, stained glass, rose windows, arabesques, denticulations, capitals, bas-reliefs,--she combines all these imaginings according to the arrangement which best suits her.Hence, the prodigious exterior variety of these edifices, at whose foundation dwells so much order and unity.The trunk of a tree is immovable; the foliage is capricious.
或许您还会喜欢:
笑面人
作者:佚名
章节:15 人气:0
摘要:维克多-雨果于一八○二年二月二十六日诞生在法国东部伯桑松城。雨果的父亲,西吉斯贝尔-雨果,本是法国东部南锡一个木工的儿子,法国大革命时他是共和国军队的上尉,曾参加过意大利和西班牙战争,在拿破仑时期晋升为将级军官。雨果从童年起就在不停的旅游中度过,他的父亲西吉斯贝尔-雨果把妻子和孩子从一个驻扎地带到另一个驻扎地。 [点击阅读]
第三个女郎
作者:佚名
章节:25 人气:0
摘要:赫邱里?白罗坐在早餐桌上。右手边放着一杯热气腾腾的巧克力,他一直嗜好甜食,就着这杯热巧克力喝的是一块小甜面包,配巧克最好吃了。他满意地点了点头。他跑了几家铺子才买了来的;是一家丹麦点心店,可绝对比附近那家号称法国面包房要好不知多少倍,那家根本是唬人的。他总算解了馋,肚子是惬意多了。他心中也是很安逸,或许太平静了一点。他已经完成了他的“文学巨著”,是一部评析侦探小说大师的写作。 [点击阅读]
第二十二条军规
作者:佚名
章节:51 人气:0
摘要:约瑟夫·海勒(1923—1999)美国黑色*幽默派及荒诞派代表作家,出生于纽约市布鲁克林一个俄裔犹太人家庭。第二次世界大战期间曾任空军中尉。战后进大学学习,1948年毕业于纽约大学,获文学学士学位。1949年在哥伦比亚大学获文学硕士学位后,得到富布赖特研究基金赴英国牛津大学深造一年。1950到1952年在宾夕法尼亚州立大学等校任教。 [点击阅读]
等待戈多
作者:佚名
章节:14 人气:0
摘要:这是一部两幕剧。第一幕,主人公流浪汉爱斯特拉冈(简称戈戈),和弗拉基米尔(简称狄狄),出现在一条村路上,四野空荡荡的,只有一棵光秃秃的树。他们自称要等待戈多,可是戈多是谁?他们相约何时见面?连他们自己也不清楚。但他们仍然苦苦地等待着。 [点击阅读]
等待野蛮人
作者:佚名
章节:24 人气:0
摘要:第一章(1)我从未见过这样的东西:两个圆圆的小玻璃片架在他眼睛前的环形金属丝上。他是瞎子吗?如果他是个盲人想要掩饰这一点,我倒可以理解。但他并不瞎。那小圆玻璃片是暗色的,从里面看出来并不透明,但他就是能透过这样的玻璃片看过来。他告诉我,这是一种新发明的玩意儿:“它能保护眼睛,不受阳光的炫照,戴上它就不必成天眯缝着眼。也可减少头痛。 [点击阅读]
精灵宝钻
作者:佚名
章节:30 人气:0
摘要:创新之书一九五一年末,在《魔戒》与《精灵宝钻》已经完稿多时,而大西洋两岸仍迟迟不肯按托尔金的要求将两书同时出版:心焦的托尔金於是写了一封长达万言的信给美国出版商,阐明他创作这整个神话世界的缘起与故事始末:我从早年就对自己所爱之乡土没有属於自己的故事感到悲伤。 [点击阅读]
精神分析引论
作者:佚名
章节:30 人气:0
摘要:序那些想获得精神分析知识的人们所面临的困难很多,尤其是缺乏一本适用的教科书可用以开始他们的研究。这些人从前可在三类课本中进行选择,但由初学者看来,每一类都各有它的缺点。他们可通过弗洛伊德、布里尔、费伦齐和我自己所刊行的大量论文,寻找他们的前进道路,这些论文不是依照任何连贯性的计划来安排的,而且大部分是写给那些对这门学问已有所知的人阅读的。 [点击阅读]
紧急传染
作者:佚名
章节:38 人气:0
摘要:1991年6月12日,这是暮春的一个近似完美的日子。天已破晓,阳光触摸着北美大陆的东海岸。美国大部、加拿大和墨西哥都在期待着阳光明媚的蓝天、只是气象雷达显示雷暴云团即将来临,估计会从平原伸向田纳西河谷。已经有预报,从白令海峡移动过来的阵雨云可能覆盖阿拉斯加的西沃德半岛。这个6月12日几乎在各个方面都与以往的6月12日没什么两样,只有一个奇怪的迹象除外。 [点击阅读]
紫阳花日记
作者:佚名
章节:18 人气:0
摘要:这可是一个完全偶然的机会发现的。实在是太偶然了。与其说是一般的偶然,更应该说不是单纯的偶然,而是好几个偶然的因素,巧上加巧碰在一起,就促成了这么件令人匪夷所思的事情。要说是促成,还不如说是完全没有想到的事情突然出现更准确。那天,川岛省吾也不知道怎么的,竟然会神使鬼差地躺在自己太太的床上休息。通常省吾都不在夫妻俩的主卧房睡觉,他在自己的书房安了一张床,平时基本上都在这张床上休息。 [点击阅读]
红与黑
作者:佚名
章节:76 人气:0
摘要:维里埃算得弗朗什-孔泰最漂亮的小城之一。一幢幢房子,白墙,红瓦,尖顶,展布在一座小山的斜坡上。茁壮的栗树密密匝匝,画出了小山最细微的凹凸。城墙下数百步外,有杜河流过。这城墙早年为西班牙人所建,如今已残破不堪。维里埃北面有高山荫护,那是汝拉山脉的一支。十月乍寒,破碎的威拉峰顶便已盖满了雪,从山上下来的一股激流,穿过小城注入杜河,使大量的木锯转动起来。 [点击阅读]
红字
作者:佚名
章节:24 人气:0
摘要:一群身穿黯色长袍、头戴灰色尖顶高帽.蓄着胡须的男人,混杂着一些蒙着兜头帽或光着脑袋的女人,聚在一所木头大扇子前面。房门是用厚实的橡木做的,上面密密麻麻地钉满大铁钉。新殖民地的开拓者们,不管他们的头脑中起初有什么关于人类品德和幸福的美妙理想,总要在各种实际需要的草创之中,忘不了划出一片未开垦的处女地充当墓地,再则出另一片土地来修建监狱。 [点击阅读]
红花
作者:佚名
章节:11 人气:0
摘要:贵志慢慢拉开她背后的拉链,让她的胸部更裸露,在洋装袖于被脱掉时,她还缩着肩协助配台。但,胸罩被拿掉的瞬间,她又不由自主交抱双臂了。虽明知终会被贵志为所欲为,冬子却不希望现在马上被碰触,至少,她要再多保留一些时候。三个月前的六月初,木之内冬子开始发觉在生理期前后有些微异的迹象。身高一百五十五公分、体重四十公斤的她身材瘦弱,对身体本就不太有自信,即使这样,最近几年却也从来没有过什么病痛。 [点击阅读]